Conservative Brew
writewhatistrue:

This is reportedly the Arabic letter being painted on the homes of Christians in Mosul to mark them out for violence. The person who originally posted this picture says: “This is the letter “Nun” (ن), the 14th letter of the Arabic alphabet (the equivalent of letter N in our Roman alphabet), the first letter of the word Nasara (نصارى : Nazarenes)”

writewhatistrue:

This is reportedly the Arabic letter being painted on the homes of Christians in Mosul to mark them out for violence. The person who originally posted this picture says: “This is the letter “Nun” (ن), the 14th letter of the Arabic alphabet (the equivalent of letter N in our Roman alphabet), the first letter of the word Nasara (نصارى : Nazarenes)”

drb1985:

The way it is. I stand with Israel.

drb1985:

The way it is. I stand with Israel.

wherelibertydwells:

jewishpolitics:

eretzyisrael:

Spot the difference! 
via: @redbrasco 

One is peaceful, the other likes to torch things 

It’s a choice between civilization or barbarism.

wherelibertydwells:

jewishpolitics:

eretzyisrael:

Spot the difference!

via: @redbrasco 

One is peaceful, the other likes to torch things 

It’s a choice between civilization or barbarism.

From article:

A new intelligence assessment concludes that misperceptions about U.S. immigration policy – and not Central American violence – are fueling the surge of thousands of children illegally crossing the Mexican border.

The 10-page July 7 report was issued by the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC), which according to the Justice Department website is led by the DEA and incorporates Homeland Security. Its focus is on the collection and distribution of tactical intelligence, information which can immediately be acted on by law enforcement.

"Of the 230 migrants interviewed, 219 cited the primary reason for migrating to the United States was the perception of U.S. immigration laws granting free passes or permisos to UAC (unaccompanied children) and adult females OTMs (other than Mexicans) traveling with minors,” the report said.

n0tofthisworld:

Credit @churchboyjay81  #truth #God #Jesus #Bible #scripture #verse

"CALL NO MAN FATHER," and yet…
Acts 7:2, Romans 9:10, 1 Corinthians 4:14-15 and Philemon 10
"NO CONFESSION TO A PRIEST," and yet…
 Matthew 18:18, John 20:21-23 and 2 Corinthians 5:18,20
"NO PRAYERS FOR THE DEAD/MARY/SAINTS?" 
OP, you cite Deut. 18:10-11 but, this passage is condemning conjuring up the dead through wizards and mediums, not praying to saints. Additionally, the Saints and angels in heaven pray for us: the saints surround us (Heb 11-12:1). In Rev. 5:8-14 and Rev. 8:3-4, we see the angels in heaven and those in the heavenly court offering up the prayers of God’s faithful here on Earth. We know that they are doing this because the word used for God’s faithful in Greek is “hagios" and this word, in context, is used in Rev. 11:18 to describe those who believe in God and have suffered for God on Earth. In Rev. 13:7 “hagios” is used to denote those whom evil is attempting to overcome and, since a saint in heave cannot be overcome by evil, “hagios” here must mean those of us on Earth fighting off temptation each and every day. Therefore, through Christ our mediator, we must conclude that there is a connectivity between those in heaven and those here on earth.
Therefore, per Scripture, those in heaven can and do offer up our prayers, and thus, intercede for us.
"MARY IS A CO-MEDIATRIX?"
Calling Mary a co-Redeemer or co-Mediator DOES NOT place her on equal level with Christ. It is thus important to note that the prefix “co” in the title Co-redemptrix does not mean “equal to” but rather “with”, coming from the Latin word cum. The Marian title co-Redemptrix/Mediatrix never places Mary on a level of equality with her Divine Son, Jesus Christ. Rather it refers to Mary’s unique human participation which is completely secondary and subordinate to the redeeming role of Jesus, who alone is true God and true Man. Co-redemptrix and co-Mediatrix do not mean “co-Savior.” 
At the Annunciation, Mary’s free and active “yes” to the invitation of the angel mediates to the world Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of the world and the Author of all graces (Lk. 1:38). For this unique participation in giving to the Redeemer his body and mediating the Source of all graces to the world, Mary can rightly be called both “Co-redemptrix” and “Mediatrix of all graces” as one who uniquely shares in the one mediation of Jesus Christ.
"NO IDOL WORSHIP" and yet…
Numbers 21:8-9

n0tofthisworld:

Credit @churchboyjay81 
#truth #God #Jesus #Bible #scripture #verse

"CALL NO MAN FATHER," and yet…

Acts 7:2, Romans 9:10, 1 Corinthians 4:14-15 and Philemon 10

"NO CONFESSION TO A PRIEST," and yet…

 Matthew 18:18John 20:21-23 and 2 Corinthians 5:18,20

"NO PRAYERS FOR THE DEAD/MARY/SAINTS?" 

OP, you cite Deut. 18:10-11 but, this passage is condemning conjuring up the dead through wizards and mediums, not praying to saints. Additionally, the Saints and angels in heaven pray for us: the saints surround us (Heb 11-12:1). In Rev. 5:8-14 and Rev. 8:3-4, we see the angels in heaven and those in the heavenly court offering up the prayers of God’s faithful here on Earth. We know that they are doing this because the word used for God’s faithful in Greek is “hagios" and this word, in context, is used in Rev. 11:18 to describe those who believe in God and have suffered for God on Earth. In Rev. 13:7 “hagios” is used to denote those whom evil is attempting to overcome and, since a saint in heave cannot be overcome by evil, “hagios” here must mean those of us on Earth fighting off temptation each and every day. Therefore, through Christ our mediator, we must conclude that there is a connectivity between those in heaven and those here on earth.

Therefore, per Scripture, those in heaven can and do offer up our prayers, and thus, intercede for us.

"MARY IS A CO-MEDIATRIX?"

Calling Mary a co-Redeemer or co-Mediator DOES NOT place her on equal level with Christ. It is thus important to note that the prefix “co” in the title Co-redemptrix does not mean “equal to” but rather “with”, coming from the Latin word cum. The Marian title co-Redemptrix/Mediatrix never places Mary on a level of equality with her Divine Son, Jesus Christ. Rather it refers to Mary’s unique human participation which is completely secondary and subordinate to the redeeming role of Jesus, who alone is true God and true Man. Co-redemptrix and co-Mediatrix do not mean “co-Savior.” 

At the Annunciation, Mary’s free and active “yes” to the invitation of the angel mediates to the world Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of the world and the Author of all graces (Lk. 1:38). For this unique participation in giving to the Redeemer his body and mediating the Source of all graces to the world, Mary can rightly be called both “Co-redemptrix” and “Mediatrix of all graces” as one who uniquely shares in the one mediation of Jesus Christ.

"NO IDOL WORSHIP" and yet…

Numbers 21:8-9

obamadawn:

Obama Air

obamadawn:

Obama Air

realhousewifeofnightvale:

communismkills:

Personhood, defined by inches
Personhood, defined by inches

WHOEVER THE FUCK WASTED HOURS OF THEIR LIFE MAKING THIS GARBAGE: DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT AN ABORTION IS? IT IS NO WAY DELIVERY OF A HEALTHY ANYTHING, IT’S NOT EVEN THE DELIVERY OF ANYTHING…

Here’s a video instead.  

Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation.

The National Health Interview Survey, which is the government’s premier tool for annually assessing Americans’ health and behaviors, found that 1.6 percent of adults self-identify as gay or lesbian, and 0.7 percent consider themselves bisexual.

peashooter85:

Fun History Fact,
The Roman Emperor Elagabalus held a lottery where the winner chose a special box.  Inside the box could be gold, jewels, a deed to a house, or ownership of a slave.  The box could also hold less desirable prizes, like a dead dog, the decapitated head of a criminal, or a swarm of bees.

Ancient history’s original Obamacare: No one knew what was in it, until it was too late.

peashooter85:

Fun History Fact,

The Roman Emperor Elagabalus held a lottery where the winner chose a special box.  Inside the box could be gold, jewels, a deed to a house, or ownership of a slave.  The box could also hold less desirable prizes, like a dead dog, the decapitated head of a criminal, or a swarm of bees.

Ancient history’s original Obamacare: No one knew what was in it, until it was too late.

stopkingobama:

Governor_Rick_PerryRepublican lawmakers over the weekend lambasted Obama’s “blank check” request for $3.7 billion to deal with the border crisis. Instead, the GOP wants a more targeted response centered on border security.

Texas Governor Rick Perry commented on Fox News Sunday that Obama doesn’t need…

The should propose a $5 million dollar legislative bill that will send all illegal criminal aliens back home via a coach, one-way ticket back to their home country’s national airline and, embed the bill with: “if we find you again in our country, you’ll go to a for-profit federal prison”

redbloodedamerica:

goodreasonnews:

Actually, no one else pays for it under the ACA, employees pay for it themselves out of their employer-chosen insurance. All the ACA tried to do was make sure those insurance plans don’t discriminate against reproductive health SINCE IT IS NECESSARY. However, more recently, a few catholic men didn’t see it that way, so now insurers can discriminate against certain reproductive health services as long as their customers (the employers who choose the health coverage) are fucking Jesus freaks.

"No one else pays for it under the ACA"  

“employees pay for it themselves out of their employer-chosen insurance.”

Yes, most employees do copay a premium, but the employer also pays the bulk of those premiums.  Some employers even put money into a HSA or pay for the entire insurance premium as a perk.  I know why you are deliberately being deceitful though; so you can point at those mean “Jesus freak” employers are taking away what you’ve paid into.  But we both know this is not really true.
"All the ACA tried to do was make sure those insurance plans don’t discriminate against reproductive health SINCE IT IS NECESSARY."

Actually, the ACA just made everyone pay for these multitude of contraceptives whether they will ever use them or not.  For instance, men are paying for female birth control.  But this is how socialism works, we pool all the money and redistribute where we see fit.  This of course just drives up the premium costs, throwing out the term “affordable” totally out of the name of the terrible bill.
"However, more recently, a few catholic men didn’t see it that way, so now insurers can discriminate against certain reproductive health services as long as their customers (the employers who choose the health coverage) are fucking Jesus freaks.”

It always boils down to the religion and gender with you clowns.  ”Those mean Catholic men just keep holding us down."  To be honest, I believe it’s the right to discriminate any service or product if you are the one paying for it.  If you don’t like it, how about we just end employer-based health care?  Sounds like a win/win.  You do your job and an employer will either pay you directly for the insurance he/she was paying for or they can just put it all in a HSA account for you to spend the way you want.  You can purchase an insurance plan of your choice on the open market or you can just pay out of pocket for services.  Then again, that will be the end of your precious free "reproductive health services.”  You’ll have to start buying them yourself, which is the way it should be in the first place.

redbloodedamerica:

goodreasonnews:

Actually, no one else pays for it under the ACA, employees pay for it themselves out of their employer-chosen insurance. All the ACA tried to do was make sure those insurance plans don’t discriminate against reproductive health SINCE IT IS NECESSARY. However, more recently, a few catholic men didn’t see it that way, so now insurers can discriminate against certain reproductive health services as long as their customers (the employers who choose the health coverage) are fucking Jesus freaks.

"No one else pays for it under the ACA"  

employees pay for it themselves out of their employer-chosen insurance.”

Yes, most employees do copay a premium, but the employer also pays the bulk of those premiums.  Some employers even put money into a HSA or pay for the entire insurance premium as a perk.  I know why you are deliberately being deceitful though; so you can point at those mean “Jesus freak” employers are taking away what you’ve paid into.  But we both know this is not really true.

"All the ACA tried to do was make sure those insurance plans don’t discriminate against reproductive health SINCE IT IS NECESSARY."

Actually, the ACA just made everyone pay for these multitude of contraceptives whether they will ever use them or not.  For instance, men are paying for female birth control.  But this is how socialism works, we pool all the money and redistribute where we see fit.  This of course just drives up the premium costs, throwing out the term “affordable” totally out of the name of the terrible bill.

"However, more recently, a few catholic men didn’t see it that way, so now insurers can discriminate against certain reproductive health services as long as their customers (the employers who choose the health coverage) are fucking Jesus freaks.

It always boils down to the religion and gender with you clowns.  ”Those mean Catholic men just keep holding us down."  To be honest, I believe it’s the right to discriminate any service or product if you are the one paying for it.  If you don’t like it, how about we just end employer-based health care?  Sounds like a win/win.  You do your job and an employer will either pay you directly for the insurance he/she was paying for or they can just put it all in a HSA account for you to spend the way you want.  You can purchase an insurance plan of your choice on the open market or you can just pay out of pocket for services.  Then again, that will be the end of your precious free "reproductive health services.”  You’ll have to start buying them yourself, which is the way it should be in the first place.

Or, instead of spending billions on theoretical drugs and wasting time, why not tell them to not have sex? That is, stop committing sodomy.

obamadawn:

Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration.  Stupid shithead.  Oh - was that rude?  Being an illegal immigrant is AGAINST THE LAW.  7/12/14.

obamadawn:

Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration. Stupid shithead. Oh - was that rude? Being an illegal immigrant is AGAINST THE LAW. 7/12/14.

gop-tea-pub:

Yeaaahhhhhh that will work. How’s that nuclear program going there?

The new “red line?”