talkstraight:
gravelmonger:
pretty-littleladyx:
poopingsperm:
im-pavido:
yourgrandmotherhas:
pretty-littleladyx:
Stop telling yourself that it is so you can feel better about sleeping with random guys off the street.
You all have zero self respect and I feel sorry for you.
actually it is bullying. you’re being rude to someone because they choose to have sex. it’s their body, let…
Slut shaming most certainly is bullying. Unless you’re sleeping with someone yourself, why is it any of your concern how many people they’ve had sex with? And does it make them any less of a person even if they have slept with a lot of people? You can choose to do whatever you want with your OWN body. Making someone feel ashamed for their own choices is bullying. The end.
It is not okay to shame someone for choosing what they do with themselves. Some people get tattoos, some people have plastic surgery, some people work out. Any person can do whatever they want with their body, and as long as the sex is consensual it shouldn’t matter to you what goes on in my or anybody else’s bedroom. Obviously, the same rules apply to this— treat everybody with respect (i.e. don’t use sex to hurt or manipulate people, be considerate of the implications your actions have on others etc)—as any other aspect of life.
‘Slut shaming’ is in fact bullying, and you need to realize that right now you’re treating other human beings in a prejudiced and derogatory way. It is not fair, it is not morally correct, and it is NOT justified.
I have self respect, and I’m not going to let you demoralize me or anybody else for making a personal choice about how we’re living. Guess what? Sex is okay.
Sex is okay if you are a girl, sex is okay if you are a boy. Sex is okay by yourself or with many people or with a toy. Sex is okay with multiple partners, sex is okay if you’re married. Sex is okay before marriage too and sex is okay if you’re hairy. Sex is okay on the floor, sex is okay with whips or whipped cream. Sex is okay with either gender or both, and sex is okay in your dreams. Sex is okay with lingerie, sex is okay down by the bay. Sex is okay in the morning or night, and sex is okay after a fight. Sex is okay when you’re fat or thin, and sex is okay if you’re okay in your skin. Sex is okay if you want to, but if you don’t I won’t get in your way. It’s a personal choice and you’ve got your own voice but please don’t use it for hate.
You’re not going to “let me?”
Sorry to say, you can’t make me do anything.
Bitches that sleep around and are proud of it make me sick. They’re sluts and its a fact.
Bitches that run around thinking they can judge everyone, think they’re better than everyone who disagree with them and are proud of it are annoying cunts.
And when you call women who disagree with you ‘bitches’, assume they think they’re better than everyone and you then conclude they’re ‘annoying cunts’….aren’t you being just as judgmental as they supposedly are?
If judging others is such a bad thing, then why are you doing it while you point out that only ‘bitches’ do it? Are you a Hypocrite or just an ‘annoying cunt’? You be the judge.
In this video, is there slut shaming involved?
2013: Democrats Blame Devastating Tornado on Global Warming….
talkstraight:
1975: Democrats blame Devastating tornado on….Global Cooling.
And you people still consider these knuckleheads to be smart.
They’re just one of the idiot rats skipping along to the Pied Piper….you know..just like you.
proudgayconservative:
jawbreakerwallace:
proudgayconservative:
conservativebrew:
freeplanetickettonorthkorea:
proudgayconservative:
conservativebrew:
Here it is in a nutshell: An adult, who is 18, HAD SEX WITH AN UNDERAGE CHILD, who is 15. This, therefore, makes the adult guilty of statutory rape.
It doesn’t matter if the adult is a homosexual. Congrats gays, you’ve strived so hard for equality, and now that it is being administered, apparently, it isn’t fair? This is what equality looks like.
Actually, no, that’s not it in a nutshell. I’ve read NO story about this in which there was any substantiated claim that there was sex occurring. I dated quite a few people in high school, of varying ages, I never had sex with any of them.
Plus, you know, Florida has a Romeo and Juliet law.
Lastly, they were both minors when they started dating. The parents of the 15 year old, instead of going to the other parents and saying that they found the relationship wrong and asking them to stop dating, waiting until she had turned 18 and reported her to the police.
This would be a ridiculous and stupid way to handle this situation no matter what genders were involved.
This isn’t about the girls being gay, this is about common fucking sense. If you don’t like who your daughter is dating you request they stop dating and ask the other parents to enforce your request, you don’t have the significant other locked up and charged with statutory rape.
I’m siding with PGC on this one
Agreed, this is about common sense…when she became an adult, she should’ve known better then to be involved with a minor.
Common sense dictates that you realize that A.) They were dating when they were both minors in the first place, the parents of the 15 year old apparently waited until she was 18 to call the cops, rather than complaining about the relationship when they were both minors and no one would go to jail. I believe that’s called ENTRAPMENT.
B.) You still haven’t addressed the fact that their is no substantiated proof that a sexual relationship was actually occurring.
C.) It’s not illegal for an 18 year old to DATE an 15 year, because 1.) Romeo and Juliet law and 2.) Dating does not = sex.
I agree that they might not have used the best sense, but it’s not something that the 18 year old should go to prison for. Plenty of times an 18 year old boy or girl will date someone below the age of 18 when they are in the same school. No one is throwing my sister’s boyfriend into prison just because he’s 18 and she’s 16.
You’re wrong for several reasons. Entrapment involves police only and also involves coercion to try to get someone to break the law. It’s not entrapment if someone waits around knowing someone is going to break the law but doesn’t stop them until they do. In fact it would be illegal for a police officer to stop someone prior to the offense unless they had strong evidence that they were going to commit the offence. The Romeo and Juliet Law doesnt make sex between a 15 and 18 year old legal it just has an appeal to have the 18 year old not be registered as a sex offender. It’s right in the link you posted. Read it closer. Also, who is to say that no sexual activity happened? The parents claim it did and she will get her day in court. They either had sex (an illegal act) or they didn’t. Why argue until you know? The sexuality of the people involved is irrelevant. If you believe this is ridiculous than you should advocate for lowering the age of consent or abolishing it all together. I for one think someone should know not to sleep with someone if it would be considered statutory rape, which this clearly is a case of (if they did indeed have sex)
My issue is that A.) legally this may not be entrapment, but that was clearly what the parents of the 15 year old were going for. You would have to be incredibly dense not to see that.
B.) The parents of the 15 year old have refused to say anything publicly on the case at all and they quite clearly had an issue with the sexuality of the issue, not just the age.
C.) People are assuming that sex MUST have occurred because the already heavily biased parents of the younger girl said that it did. If they are willing to do what they did in order to send an 18 year old to prison for dating their daughter, their statement of sexual conduct is questionable at best.
D.) The parents of the 15 year old are assholes. They handled this in completely the wrong way and anyone who claims otherwise is being intentionally obtuse. Unless their daughter came to them and told them that she WAS being forced by the 18 year old (which she has said is not the case) then they should have simply dealt with the issue privately by asking Kaitlynn to stop seeing their daughter and talking to Kaitlynn’s parents about it. Instead they waited until they could entrap her (yes, I will continue to use that word, it fits) to get her arrested.
The point here is that sex DID occur. On the Free Kate facebook page, her own mother says the following on the second paragraph:
In September, shortly after Kaitlyn’s 18th birthday, the girls began dating, and they eventually expressed their affection for one another in intimate ways.
Her own mother admits that they were intimate AFTER Kaitlyn’s 18th birthday, that is, AFTER she became an adult. Congrats Kate! That makes you criminal.
Everyone is trying to make this an LGBT issue but, it is not. Had Kaitlyn not of been engaged in intimate contact with a minor, none of this would’ve happened. And that IS the real issue here.
freeplanetickettonorthkorea:
proudgayconservative:
conservativebrew:
proudgayconservative:
mistercaekface:
proudgayconservative:
geekgirl101:
Kaitlyn Hunt, 18, had her entire life before her. Graduation. College. Job prospects. The high school senior was just preparing to start her life when she found herself expelled and slapped with criminal charges over her engagement in a same-sex relationship. And what started as a relationship between two…
Yeah. You read that right.
Don’t they have to have proof that these girls actually had sex?
And yes, this pisses me off, because if the younger girl had been a boy and dating an 18 year old girl, I highly doubt the parents would have said a single fucking thing about it.
Ridiculous to charge an 18 year old with a felony because she was dating someone she went to school with who she was dating before she turned 18.
I like The Blaze, and I’m [trying to be] a Christian, but many of those people in the comment section need to shut the fuck up. Yes, the Bible condemns homosexuality in some passages, but the Bible also says not to judge those who do not live by Christ.
The article doesn’t even say for sure they were in a sexual relationship. What if they’re just really close friends?
My 16 year old sister is dating an 18 year old boy. Their “dating” consists of going to prom and going to his house (when his parents are home) after school to watch Firefly and The Walking Dead.
Unless they have documented proof that sexual relations was going on, this can’t be charged as sexual abuse of a minor between the ages of 12 and 16.
What pisses me off more is that they went straight to the cops, even though it was consensual, instead of talking to the other girl and her parents about the fact that they did not approve of the relationship. Instead of dealing with it in a rational manner, like they likely would have if their daughter was dating an older boy or they had a son dating an older girl, they heap charges on her because of her sexuality. That’s just ridiculous.
Here it is in a nutshell: An adult, who is 18, HAD SEX WITH AN UNDERAGE CHILD, who is 15. This, therefore, makes the adult guilty of statutory rape.
It doesn’t matter if the adult is a homosexual. Congrats gays, you’ve strived so hard for equality, and now that it is being administered, apparently, it isn’t fair? This is what equality looks like.
Actually, no, that’s not it in a nutshell. I’ve read NO story about this in which there was any substantiated claim that there was sex occurring. I dated quite a few people in high school, of varying ages, I never had sex with any of them.
Plus, you know, Florida has a Romeo and Juliet law.
Lastly, they were both minors when they started dating. The parents of the 15 year old, instead of going to the other parents and saying that they found the relationship wrong and asking them to stop dating, waiting until she had turned 18 and reported her to the police.
This would be a ridiculous and stupid way to handle this situation no matter what genders were involved.
This isn’t about the girls being gay, this is about common fucking sense. If you don’t like who your daughter is dating you request they stop dating and ask the other parents to enforce your request, you don’t have the significant other locked up and charged with statutory rape.
I’m siding with PGC on this one
Agreed, this is about common sense…when she became an adult, she should’ve known better then to be involved with a minor.
proudgayconservative:
mistercaekface:
proudgayconservative:
geekgirl101:
Kaitlyn Hunt, 18, had her entire life before her. Graduation. College. Job prospects. The high school senior was just preparing to start her life when she found herself expelled and slapped with criminal charges over her engagement in a same-sex relationship. And what started as a relationship between two…
Yeah. You read that right.
Don’t they have to have proof that these girls actually had sex?
And yes, this pisses me off, because if the younger girl had been a boy and dating an 18 year old girl, I highly doubt the parents would have said a single fucking thing about it.
Ridiculous to charge an 18 year old with a felony because she was dating someone she went to school with who she was dating before she turned 18.
I like The Blaze, and I’m [trying to be] a Christian, but many of those people in the comment section need to shut the fuck up. Yes, the Bible condemns homosexuality in some passages, but the Bible also says not to judge those who do not live by Christ.
The article doesn’t even say for sure they were in a sexual relationship. What if they’re just really close friends?
My 16 year old sister is dating an 18 year old boy. Their “dating” consists of going to prom and going to his house (when his parents are home) after school to watch Firefly and The Walking Dead.
Unless they have documented proof that sexual relations was going on, this can’t be charged as sexual abuse of a minor between the ages of 12 and 16.
What pisses me off more is that they went straight to the cops, even though it was consensual, instead of talking to the other girl and her parents about the fact that they did not approve of the relationship. Instead of dealing with it in a rational manner, like they likely would have if their daughter was dating an older boy or they had a son dating an older girl, they heap charges on her because of her sexuality. That’s just ridiculous.
Here it is in a nutshell: An adult, who is 18, HAD SEX WITH AN UNDERAGE CHILD, who is 15. This, therefore, makes the adult guilty of statutory rape.
It doesn’t matter if the adult is a homosexual. Congrats gays, you’ve strived so hard for equality, and now that it is being administered, apparently, it isn’t fair? This is what equality looks like.
To express the sense of the Congress that the United States should not adopt any treaty that poses a threat to national sovereignty or abridges any rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution, such as the right to keep and bear arms, and to withhold funding from the United Nations unless the President certifies that the United Nations has not taken action to restrict, attempt to restrict, or otherwise adversely infringe upon the rights of individuals in the United States to keep and bear arms, or abridge any of the other constitutionally protected rights of citizens of the United States.
CALL YOUR REP. TODAY!!!! THIS IS A PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD BE BEHIND.
Listening to the IRS hearings…
Turns out the out-going IRS commish, Steven Miller, is having a couple of bouts of amnesia in the same manner as Eric Holder.
7 ”Chemical Engineers” from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were caught trespassing at Quabbin Reservoir, Boston’s Main water supply.Though police say there was no evidence that the seven were committing any crime beyond the trespassing.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
stuff-that-irks-me:
STUPID
Seems like an “infringement” upon a Constitutional right due to the fact that it places an unnecessary burden upon a U.S. citizen who chooses to exercise their 2nd Amendment right.
abso1utetruth:
A man recently captured police, who were outside his home answering a call about a domestic violence complaint, in what can only be described as a very bizarre video.
The unidentified Cotati, Calif., man and woman tell the police from inside their home that “there is no domestic violence, just an argument with yelling.”
They also inform police that they have one child in the house and one playing outside.
When the police ask the couple “why” they are not coming out, the man inside tells police: “Because we don’t live in a police state, sir. Martial law has not been established in this country.”
The man insists that police do not have a warrant or probable cause. Seconds later, the police tell the people inside to get down on the floor.
Police then break down the door and enter armed.
The woman is tased first and screams, then the man is tased and the recording ends.
Fucking cops
I can’t believe that this would happen in super hyper progressive liberal “only-the-cops-should-have-guns” California???
